Health & Wellness Centres
Health & Wellness
Centres are envisaged to provide a comprehensive set of 12 services:
1.
Comprehensive
Maternal Health care services to be provided in those sites equipped to services
as “delivery point”.
2.
Comprehensive
neonatal and infant health care services.
3.
Comprehensive
childhood and adolescent health care services
4.
Comprehensive
contraceptive services.
5.
Comprehensive
reproductive health services.
6.
Comprehensive
management of communicable diseases.
7.
Screening
and Comprehensive management of non communicable diseases.
8.
Basic
ophthalmic care services
9.
Basic ENT
care service
10.
Screening
and basic management of mental health ailments.
11.
Basic dental
healthcare.
12.
Basic
geriatric health care services.
Existing Staff pattern
MPHA(F) +MPHA(M) HWC MLP : Mid Level
Provider (B.Sc. Nursing), to lead the Primary Health Care Team at Subcentre
MPHA (F) and (M)) and ASHAs
Job responsibility of MLP : MLHP would be
responsible for ---
Ø Implementation of National Health
Programmes
Ø
Administration and
management at Health and Wellness Centers
Ø
Provision of preventive,
promotive and curative care
Ø Identification of danger
signs and referral after pre-referral stabilization
Ø Ensuring quality
protocols are adhered to— including implementation of Biomedical waste disposal and Infection Control guidelines.
Ø Provision of on the job mentioning to
health workers
Ø Ensuring maintenance of
inventory of drugs, consumables, diagnostic and other equipment
Ø Ensuring maintenance of
records, and undertaking monthly reviews of key indicators and provide feedback to the team
Ø Participation in monthly
outreach and community level meetings including engaging with representatives of Local Government
institutions/ VHSNC
Ø Any other job assigned by
the Medical Officer of the PHC.
Institutionalizing Performance Linked Payments (PLP) for
Mid- Level Health Providers (MLHP)
Background: The Operational
Guidelines for Ayushman Bharat: Comprehensive Primary Health Care through Health and Wellness Centres
identify Performance Linked Payments as a strategy to improve motivation levels, strengthen
quality of services, enhance accountability for
population health outcomes and serve as a mechanism to identify performance
and skill gaps, at the Health and
Wellness Centers at sub center level. The PLP are provided for the
Mid-Level Health Providers who will play
a key role in enabling continuum of care.
This guidance note is expected to enable the states to roll out
Performance Linked Payments for the
primary care team at the HWC-SHC - A Mid-Level Health Provider (Team leader),
in the catchment population of the
HWC-SHC.
These payments are to be made on a monthly basis. Individual
performance will be assessed on the basis of data obtained from existing
information systems. However, states also have the flexibility to undertake
independent monitoring, to validate the information systems. This could be done through partnerships with
research organizations, NGOs, State Health System Resource Centres and medical colleges or
through training the existing staff at district and block level to undertake population- linked surveys
to monitor progress on outcomes on a periodic
basis.
The key features and suggested indicators to guide performance
linked payment mechanism at HWC-SHC is explained below
1. Level of Incentive Distribution:
Sub-Centre-Health and Wellness Centres
2. HWC-SHC - Mid-Level Health
Provider as per the population of the HWC-service area.
3. Periodicity: Every Month
4. Indicators for performance
measurement and source of verification:The performance will be assessed on indicators that will be amix
of service utilization and coverage of
population for essential services. (Table 1).
Key criteria for selection of indicators is that they cover
essential activities related to the first
seven service packages of CPHC that have been rolled out. Thus,
outpatient services for acute simple
illnesses, provision of ANC, Immunization, services, screening and management
for NCDs and TB, and management of
Vector borne diseases have been included. In addition, other public health and management functions of
HWC-SHC teams such as community level meetings
for health promotion and prevention, and monthly meetings at HWC-SHCs
have also been included.
The selected indicators are those that are reported in the RCH
portal, CPHC-NCD Application, and
Nikshay. Monthly performance will be assessed on a set of 15 indicators. That
have been specified in Table 1.
Additional indicators if required may be included by each State/UT linked on their specific context.For example states
having a high burden of vector borne diseases may include indicators pertaining
to same. However, the total amount linked with performance incentive for HWC would remain the same.
(Refer Point 5)
The list of indicators will be updated periodically linked on the-
experience gained from the
implementation of performance linked payments, progress on outcomes and
roll out of new service packages.
5.
Distribution of Incentive Amount for each HWC- The monthly
incentive could follow the distribution
listed below:
a.
The maximum
amount of incentive for Rs 15,000/ MLHP/month as per the work performance.
6.
Incentive Amount to be allocated for the indicators- For ease of
implementation in the early stages, all
indicators are weighted equally, and the MLHP would receive Rs. 1000 per indicator, up to a maximum of Rs.
15,000.
7.
Service Delivery Output for incentive payment- The service
delivery outputs as included in Table 1
have been graded at two levels of achievement: 75% and 100% for 8 out 15 indicators. Performance linked payment that
is to be disbursed for each indicator will
correspond the level of achievement.
8.
Illustration for Calculation of incentives-*
|
Assessme nt Indicator |
Definition |
Source of Verificat ion/ Reporti ng |
Service Delivery Output to receive 75% of Incentive Payment |
Service Delivery Output to receive 100% of Incentive Payment |
Maximum incentive allocation for each personnel (Rs) at 75% achievement |
Maximum incentive allocation for each personnel (Rs) at 100% achievement |
1 |
Number of OPD cases in the month |
No. of OPD cases including new and old cases |
NCD applicati on |
Min. 300 OP/Month |
400 OP/month |
MLHP=750 |
MLHP=1000 |
Based on
standard assumption that there fifteen indicators and monthly incentive allocated
9. Key principles to assess
performance:
➢ Indicators for performance
measurement of the primary care should be easily verifiable. The selection of indicators is
such that report for these indicators can be
verified from the existing information systems such as- RCH
Portal/Registers, NCD Application of the
CPHC IT system, NIKSHAY, IDSP reports, meeting records submitted to PHC Medical Officer.
➢ Ensuring that data is fed
accurately and regularly in the information system at each level is a collective and individual responsibility
of the HWC.
10.
Process-
➢ The PHC Medical Officer under
whose jurisdiction the HWC-SHC is assigned or (any other suitable representative as decided by
the state) will be responsible for assessing
the performance of the HWC-SHC . He/ She will-
a.
Ensure that
MLHPs/MPWs are trained in using the CPHC IT system for online auto compilation
and transmission of performance data for HWC-SHC team. However, till the time such a system is in
place, MLHPs will use the data entered in the respective information system to
submit performance reports on service delivery outputs for the particular month
in a standard format developed by the state.
b.
Ensure
release of performance- linked incentives within one month of submission of performance report by MLHPs.
c.
Use the
performance monitoring mechanism to identify the areas of improvement for the primary care team at the
HWC-SHCand provide the necessary
handholding and support to improving the performance and overall service delivery at HWCs.
d.
Undertake monthly
visits to every HWC for field level monitoring visits and use these visits to handhold and mentor HWC-SHC
team.
11.
Mode of Validation
a.
Local-PHC-MO
will assess and validate the records submitted by MLHPs with the reports from information systems- RCH
Portal/Registers, NCD Application of the
CPHC IT system, NIKSHAY, IDSP reports, meeting records submitted for performance-
linked payment.
External- (i) Existing mechanisms of 104 Call Centre etc. can also
be used to validate team performance
data reported by MLHPs. (ii) States can also opt to assess service use and satisfaction by random surveys of service
users through telephone surveys, (iii) States may also opt for nominating an independent committee
comprising of officials and civil society
representative to validate the quantity and quality of service delivered
by HWCs. This committee can evaluate the
performance quarterly or bi annually to ensure that no conflict of interest arise, during the process of
performance- linked payment.
12.
Ensuring timely payments
Though external validation is essential to check fraudulent
reporting; in any given circumstance monthly payment of incentives to MLHPs and
frontline functionaries should not await call centre linked validations.
13.
Possible Action for False reporting by MLHPs:
MLHP as team leader would be accountable for submitting
performance reports of HWC-SHC team. He/she should be given one warning if an
instance of false reporting of performance indicators is identified from the
call-linked validation of performance reports. Any repeat of falsification
could result in deducting the amount from their salaries, and a third instance
could lead to termination of service
contracts of MLHPs if continuous false reporting is observed despite warning.
Table 1 Suggestive List of Indicators to Assess Monthly
Performance of HWC-SHC for Service
Utilization
|
Assessment Indicator |
Definition
|
Source
of Verification/ Reporting
|
Service Delivery Output
to receive
75% of Incentive Payment |
Service Delivery Output
to receive
100% of Incentive Payment |
|
|||||
1 |
Number of
OPD cases in
the month |
No. of
OPD cases including new and old cases |
NCD application |
Min.
300 OP/Month |
400 OP/month |
|
|||||
2 |
Proportion
of estimated pregnancies registered |
Numerator:
Number of pregnant women registered for ANC Denominator
– Total no. of estimated pregnancies |
RCH
Portal/ Sub
Centre register |
60% of
the estimated pregnancies registered |
80% of
the estimated pregnancies registered |
|
|||||
3 |
Proportion
of Pregnant
Women registered who received
ANC |
Numerator
- No. of pregnant women who received ANC services (as per schedule)
in a month Denominator
- Total no. of registered pregnant
women whose ANC is due that month |
RCH
portal/Sub Centre RCH register |
80% of
the pregnant women received
ANC as per schedule |
100% of
the pregnant women received
ANC as per schedule |
|
|||||
4 |
Proportion of Children up to 2 years
of age who received immunization |
Numerator - No. of
children who received immunization (as per
schedule) in a month Denominator - Total no.
of registered children whose immunization was due
that month |
RCH portal/Sub Centre
RCH register |
90% of the children received immunization as per schedule |
100% of the
children received immunization as per schedule |
|
|||||
5 |
Proportion of High risk pregnant women who received follow-up care |
Numerator - No. of
high-risk pregnant women
who received follow up care
(as per schedule) in a month Denominator - Total no.
of high- risk pregnant women
identified |
RCH portal/Sub Centre
RCH register |
100% of high-risk pregnant
women who received follow up
care |
|
|
|||||
6 |
Proportion
of Newborns
who received
HBNC visits |
Numerator
- No.of newborns who received
visits (as per schedule) as per HBNC schedule Denominator
- Total no.of newborns |
RCH
portal/Sub Centre RCH register |
80%
of newborn received HBNC
visits |
100%
of newborn received HBNC
visits |
|
|||||
7. |
Proportion
of above 30
years individuals screened
for Hypertension* |
Numerator
- No. of individuals screened for Hypertension Denominator-Total population above 30 years of age |
NCD application
|
Cumulative
monthly 8% increment(SCREENING)
of above 30 individuals screened
for HTN and to be repeated every
year. |
|
||||||
8. |
Proportion
of above 30
years individuals screened
for Diabetes* |
Numerator
- No. of individuals screened for Diabetes Denominator-Total population above 30 years of age |
NCD application
|
Cumulative
monthly 8% increment
(SCREENING)of above 30
individuals screened
for Diabetes and to be repeated every year |
|
||||||
9 |
Proportion
of Patient
of HTN on treatment |
Numerator
- No. of HTN patients who received follow up care Denominator - Total no. of HTN/ patients |
NCD application |
30%
of patients
who received treatment
|
50%
of patients
who received treatment
|
||||||
10 |
Proportion of Patient of DM on treatment |
Numerator - No. of DM patients who received follow up care Denominator - Total no. of DM/ patients |
NCD application |
30% of patients who received
treatment |
50% of patients who received
treatment |
||||||
11 |
Proportion of cases referred for TB screening |
Numerator-Number of suspected TB cases referred for diagnosis/
Denominator Total number of patients attended in OPD |
Nikshay/HWC records |
Minimum 3% cases identified from
OPD should have referred for screening of TB |
|||||||
12 |
Notified TB patients who received treatment as per protocols |
Numerator - No.of TB patients who are on regular
treatment as per protocol
Denominator - Total no.of TB patients |
Nikshay/TB treatment card |
100% of patients on treatment |
|||||||
13 |
VHND held against planned |
Numerator - No.of VHND attended Denominator - Total no.of VHND held |
Self- reported in CPHC NCDapplication |
MLHP should monitor at least two VHNDs in a month for performance- linked incentive |
|||||||
14 |
Village meetings (VHSNCs)/MASheld |
Numerator - No.of VHSNC / Village meetings attended as per plan Denominator - Total no.of VHSNC/ Village meetings held |
MLHP should monitor at least two VHNSC meeting in a month for performance linked incentive |
||||||||
15 |
Monthly meetings held at SHC- HWCs |
Organized monthly meeting with Primary Care Team at Sub centers HWCs to monitor the following
1. Review
of work plan for current month. 2.
Updating work plan for the next month. 3. At
least one technical
session held for
capacity building
of the primary
health care team. |
One meeting held at the SHC HWC
and should be attended by MPWs and
all ASHAs |
||||||||
Bridge
Course undergone by the MLHP
• 6 month course — by IGNOU
• Course Outline —
• Theory classes and hands-on
Practicum training at Programme Study Centers and Health Centers (District Hospitals, CHCs, PHCs,
Sub-centers, etc.) identified and accredited IGNOU. • In addition, community visits
would also be conducted for field- based assignments and research projects.
Site |
Activities |
District
Hospital & CHC |
Case
management, Understand Functionality,
HR pattern, lab services, records
& reports, M&E, etc. |
Orientation
visit to Primary Health Centre |
Case
management of general medical
conditions, ambulatory, Infrastructure & equipement, functioning of PHCs |
Orientation
Community visit to Sub Centers and
Community |
Antenatal,
postnatal, camps, management &
referrals, Health education, observe
VHNDs and functions of ASHA in field. |
Visit to
DPMU, BPMU, PRIs, centers where the
programs are being implemented |
Understanding
the system of Health planning &
Management: Village Health Action
Plan – Role of PRIs, VHSNCs,
Observation of activities undertaken under the National Health & Family
Welfare programs |
Mid level
health providers are posted in the sub centers in the initial phase.
All the sub
centers except headquarters sub centers will be converted into e-sub centers by
March 2019.
The PHC Medical Officer is overall incharge of MLHP and MLHP should report to Medical Officer for any queries.
No comments:
Post a Comment